1983. From a
novel or play of literary merit, select an important character who is a
villain. Then, in a well-organized essay, analyze the nature of the character's
villainy and show how it enhances meaning in the work. Do not merely summarize
the plot.
In the novel, Lord of the Flies William Golding uses
the story’s villain, Jack to emphasize the meaning of the work; without the
laws of society, humans would be evil in nature. He does this by making the
character start out as an innocent boy, having him develop a thirst for blood,
and having him transition back into a boy when civilization returns.
By introducing Jack to the story
as an innocent choir boy, Golding emphasizes the transition that takes place in
his character. For example, when the book begins and the boys all find each other
on the island, Jack is all for maintaining order within the group. He even
volunteers to be the leader, although Ralph beats him out for the position. As
the story continues, however, Ralph becomes more involved in hunting and
eventually becomes obsessed with power and control. Because of this, he goes
from being a mere boy, to becoming a ruthless ruler of his portion of the
island. This emphasizes the idea that people would be evil without society because
Jack becomes this way due of the absence of civilization. Since he was a young
boy, it was easier for him to forget the once obvious rules with which it society
held while isolated on the island, thus allowing him to take up his natural
state of an inherently evil nature.
Golding also emphasizes the
meaning of this novel by having Jack become bloodthirsty and violent. At the
beginning of the novel when Jack is still an innocent boy, he fears killing a
pig. As the story progresses, however, he becomes obsessed with violently
hunting and even kills the baby pigs for sport. Even still, that is not enough
for him. At a feast, he convinces the other boys to attack, and ultimately kill
Simon, saying that he is the beast. This is the first instance in which one of
the boys is murdered and shows how truly evil Jack has become. He then goes on
to instruct his followers to kill Piggy. These acts of violence were tools used
by Golding to show how evil the villain, Jack has become. In doing this it
brings the reader back to the easy transition from good to evil in the absence
of society.
Golding continues to support the
idea that society is what keeps people from becoming evil by having his villain
return to his more innocent state upon rediscovering civilization. This occurs
just after the climax of the novel, when Jack decides to burn down the entire
island in hopes of killing Ralph. A naval ship discovers the fire and a naval
officer finds the boys. As soon as they are found, Jack goes back to behaving
like his original self—the choir boy. This transition back into what society
originally made him, further emphasizes Golding’s message.
Golding uses the villain's character changes from good to evil, and then from evil to good, and the violence that it entailed to enhance the meaning of
the novel, Lord of the Flies. These
transitions show how he evolves in the absence of civilization into an evil
being, to rediscovering his original form of an innocent boy when reintroduced
to society. This embodies the basic meaning of the work as a whole —that without society, humans would be evil in nature.
I thought the book you used was a great example for your prompt and I thought you did a good job of using support for your thesis! For your beginning paragraph I think it might be a good idea to add more detail or just add more to lead into your thesis. I get there is not a lot of time so its not the worst thing in the world if you don't include more, but it might be a good idea! I also think the beginning paragraph is a little choppy too. Adding more sentences that are different in length might help with this! I also think in the second paragraph it would be a good idea for more different sentence lengths and you could use this to emphasize the main point of how evil people can be without society rules. Overall I thought you did a great job!
ReplyDeleteI remember writing about the same topic and using the same book. This is a perfect fit. As I love the book, your thesis is quite good as it is direct and it is supported well throughout. The flow of your paragraphs could use some work but it's nothing horrible. The essay has to be written in such quick. Given that, I think you have good ideas that make the essay work. As I read I found that the essay became slightly repetitive in the fact that your paragraph construction was very similar. As Mackenzie has identified, using different sentence lengths will add more spice to the essay. Nice Job!
ReplyDelete