1982. In great
literature, no scene of violence exists for its own sake. Choose a work of
literary merit that confronts the reader or audience with a scene or scenes of
violence. In a well-organized essay, explain how the scene or scenes contribute
to the meaning of the complete work. Avoid plot summary.
In the novel, Lord of the Flies, William Golding includes
various scenes of violence to prove his idea that humans are evil in nature. He
does this by adding in scenes with excessive amounts of violence as the plot
progresses, thus showing the reader how the distance from civilization has
turned the boys into savages.
The first example of this is
seen is when Jack decides to take some of the boys hunting. This causes them to acquire a thirst for blood and they become more
violent and ruthless with their killing. The boys grow obsessed with hunting
and use brutal tactics—even killing baby pigs for the sport of it. These
extreme levels of violence in their hunt show the reader that the boys are
losing their grip of right and wrong and are becoming savage in the lack of civilization.
Another example of a violent
scene with meaning is when all of the boys go to a feast with Jack’s group. Here
they speak of the beast and how they are going to kill it. Excitement grows as
they talk of how they will triumph over the beast, causing them to lose their
sense of reason by the time Simon walks in from the forest. The boys lose
control and violently attack him, ultimately resulting in his death. This again
shows Golding’s expression of how the boys had become primitive without the
rules of society to keep them in line.
The third example of Golding’s
use of violence in scenes to show the meaning of the novel is during the climax
of the story when Piggy and Ralph go to Jack’s fort to get Piggy’s glasses
back and Roger drops a boulder that hits Piggy and sends him
airborne. This causes Piggy’s head to be smashed from the impact and he dies
instantly. This is the final scene of violence used by Golding and its dramatic
imagery gives the reader the sense of horror. The violence in this is used to
emphasize how truly savage the boys have become since their initial arrival on
the island. In addition to this, Golding’s targeting of Piggy creates a greater
contrast—the one who maintained the ideas of society throughout the novel is
being killed in the most savage way. This makes the brutality seem even more
extreme, thus reiterating how horrible the boys have become.
Golding uses these various
scenes of violence to portray the overall theme and meaning of the novel—without the
rules of society, people would be evil in nature. The brutal acts represent the
change in morality within the boys. The more horrific the action, the further
they have grown from civilization and the more savage they have become.
I thought your essay was pretty concise and stayed on the main point, but i would fix some of your words choices to make the essay clearer. For example, you describe the violence is in "unnecessary amounts" which confused me at first since I thought you were saying the entire act was unnecessary instead of just the amount. Maybe use "excessive" or "overwhelming amounts" instead. Also, when you say message do you mean theme or motif? Paragraph 3 could also have less background on the death of piggy. Only use the part where he dies to support your thesis. Overall a very good essay.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your analysis of the book, especially on how Piggy's death is more brutal than the rest because of his maintaining the beliefs of society. The background seems like a lot, but at the same time, from the perspective of someone who's never read Lord of the Flies, it was also useful and I'm not sure if there's a way of making it more concise. You also support your argument very well with the points.
ReplyDeleteI do agree with Julia in that there are a couple places with some slightly ambiguous word choice. She pointed out the one which caught my attention, the "unnecessary amounts" point. Also, the second sentence in the second paragraph is a little strangely worded. I think it's mainly a grammar issue, but I'd keep an eye out to make sure nothing is worded funny.
Overall, great essay!
Just a few things to correct.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Julia when she wants you to change "unnecessary amounts of violence", so something less ambiguous. Instead, you could talk about how the acts of violence are becoming more and more savage as the book progresses.
And in your essay, I would like some more explanantion as to whether the death of Simon or the death of Piggy was more violent. You say that as the story continues, the acts of violence are getting worse. But do you think Simon or Piggy's death was more dastardly than the other?
I think your essay was well-written and concise.