Over this past
week, we spent most of our class time going over literary terms and the AP
writing basics. The terms were very difficult to fully understand without first
being exposed to examples showing their usage. It was also frustrating to have to memorize a
single word for something that I used to identify with a phrase or two. To me,
it seemed silly to use a word such as paraprosdokian to describe a concept as
simple as a surprise ending to a phrase. The word itself is not even recognized
by Microsoft Word, so why should I need to know how and when to use it? My view
of this changed, however, after looking at the PowerPoints on Spruz about AP
essay writing. After seeing how extensive the process of identifying the
rhetorical situation and setting up an argument is, I realized that these confusing
terms might actually be able to help me create a more clear and concise essay
after all. As Harvey
often mentioned in The Nuts and Bolts of
College Writing, it is important to not be overly pompous in your essay,
and to stay focused on the topic. Keeping wordiness to a minimum by replacing
lengthy phrases with these new literary terms will help do this. For example, one
of the techniques used by authors is the repetition of conjunctions in a series
of phrases. When writing about this in an essay, the word polysyndeton could be
used to describe it instead of the nine words used previously. Since the
majority of the essay is probably about a much greater topic than that repetition,
it is better to use the term to describe it. This way the reader will not have
to deal with the constant distraction of the writer straying from the main idea
in attempt to describe a minor concept.
I also found the vocabulary challenging, and still haven't grasped all of them, but I know that they are useful. Even though we don't have time to review them in class, I wish we had gone over examples. I thought we needed them just for discussing literature in class eaiser, but I guess it makes sense to use the new vocab in ap essays.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the terms were difficult to understand and pick up without many examples and such. It was also deceiving to me, because some of them I was familiar with, so I assumed that I would be able to understand the rest of them quickly and without putting much time into them. And yes, the usage of them in essays would probably cut down on the word length. At the same time, though, I wonder whether using these terms would result in jargon-filled writing, which makes it more difficult for the average reader to understand, which is something that Harvey warns us against. Just my thoughts.
ReplyDeleteWhile I was studying for the terms, I was also very confused as to whether these words would be applicable enough. In the case of the term "paraprosdokian", I would wonder if these words were simply randomly put together to describe something as mundane as a surprise ending to a phrase.
ReplyDeleteWith these literary terms, it might hurt to study them (at first), but they will help you in the long run.
And isn't it better to condense "a surprise ending to a phrase" into one word?